NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 210.6 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 6,738 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 3597
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 435
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47301 vs 22044
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 vs 64.199
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1718.593 vs 1284.053
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 vs 5.881
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 vs 312.822
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 6508
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 6508
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops vs 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47301 vs 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 vs 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 vs 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 vs 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 vs 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 vs 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 vs 6508 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.169 vs 28.289
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3691
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3340
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3691
- 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3340
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.169 vs 28.289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 | 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 | 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47301 | 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | 78.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 24690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 24690 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5527 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP104B | Amethyst |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 319 | 316 |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 723 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |