NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 567x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 906 vs 603
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 1718.593
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 28.289
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3691
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3691

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

• Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 9321
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47331 vs 32445
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 vs 121.124
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.283 vs 8.452
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 vs 510.941
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 11437
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1676
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 11437
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1676
• Around 62% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5527 vs 3404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9321 10465
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	906 603
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32445 47331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 5527

Compare specifications (specs)