NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1075 MHz
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 210.6 GTexel / s vs 192 billion / sec
• Around 1% better floating-point performance: 6,738 gflops vs 6,691 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8 GB/s vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44918 vs 40196
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 vs 518.554
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 vs 9834
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 vs 9834
• Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5526 vs 5228

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

• Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13048 vs 10465
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 603
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.231 vs 150.951
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.225 vs 28.289

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10465 13048
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	603 847
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	44918 40196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.951 157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1718.593 1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.283 12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.289 38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	710.366 518.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13765 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3691 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13765 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3691 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5526 5228

Compare specifications (specs)