NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1379 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- 911x better floating-point performance: 5,648 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9848 vs 8827
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39513 vs 39028
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 214.123 vs 116.142
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2293.496 vs 1022.932
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.704 vs 9.235
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.717 vs 84.034
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 692.9 vs 607.721
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14915 vs 11281
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3695
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3349
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14915 vs 11281
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3695
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3349
- 4.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4887 vs 1005
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 18 April 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1379 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9848 vs 8827 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39513 vs 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 vs 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 vs 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 vs 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 vs 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 vs 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 vs 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 vs 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 vs 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 vs 1005 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- 1093.3x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 423
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 vs 423 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9848 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39513 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 | 1005 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 218 | 341 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1379 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | 6.2 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 176.5 GTexel / s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |