NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3409
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3077
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3409
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3077

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000

• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1215 MHz
• Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1379 MHz
• Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
• Around 57% better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 5,648 gflops
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 115 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 8008 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12384 vs 9878
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 671 vs 436
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49641 vs 37928
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 vs 214.123
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 vs 2293.496
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 vs 12.704
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.845 vs 139.717
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 927.006 vs 692.9
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 14915
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 14915
• Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6008 vs 4887

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9878 12384
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	436 671
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	37928 49641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	214.123 223.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2293.496 2698.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.704 14.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.717 140.845
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	692.9 927.006
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14915 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8902 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8048 3077
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14915 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8902 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8048 3077
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4887 6008

Compare specifications (specs)