NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 4.2x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 384
- 7.5x more texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec
- 6.7x more pipelines: 2560 vs 384
- 10x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15564 vs 2360
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 vs 479
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2016 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 384 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15564 vs 2360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 vs 479 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 150x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 10 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15564 | 2360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 | 479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55446 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1558 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | GP104 | GF104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2016 | 5 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 286 | 264 |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 384 |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | None |
Width | 2-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10 GB/s | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |