NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 283.4 GTexel / s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 9,068 gflops vs 5,914 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 vs 114.288
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 10.947
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 683.568
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 11675
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 3706
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 3350
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 11675
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 3706
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 3350
- Around 70% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7216 vs 4242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops vs 5,914 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 vs 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 vs 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 vs 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 vs 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 vs 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 vs 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 vs 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 vs 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7216 vs 4242 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
- 105x more memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 vs 2036.763
- 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 vs 27.417
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 2560 |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 vs 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 vs 27.417 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | 2911.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | 118.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7216 | 4242 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9443 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Grenada |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | $429 |
Place in performance rating | 280 | 279 |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | 5,914 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 6,200 million |
Compute units | 44 | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 275 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 bit |
Memory clock speed | 10 GB/s | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |