NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 69% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1771 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 53% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 283.4 GTexel / s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 53% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 9,068 gflops versus 5,914 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 53% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 275 Watt
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 versus 114.288
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 10.947
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 683.568
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 versus 11675
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 versus 3706
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 versus 3350
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 versus 11675
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 versus 3706
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 versus 3350
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7252 versus 4242
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s versus 184.8 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops versus 5,914 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 275 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 versus 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 versus 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 versus 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 versus 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7252 versus 4242 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Environ 10% de pipelines plus haut: 2816 versus 2560
- 105x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 versus 2036.763
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 versus 27.417
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2816 versus 2560 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 versus 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 versus 27.417 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52423 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | 2911.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | 118.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7252 | 4242 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9437 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 820 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP104 | Grenada |
Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499.99 | $429 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 281 | 280 |
Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops | 5,914 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2816 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 6,200 million |
Unités de Compute | 44 | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Longeur | 275 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | 384 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 512 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10 GB/s | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |