NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 283.4 GTexel / s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
• Around 27% better floating-point performance: 9,068 gflops vs 7,168 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 275 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 vs 140.274
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 13.082
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 789.536
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 10116
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 3717
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 3356
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 10116
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 3717
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 3356
• Around 52% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7216 vs 4739

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury

• Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
• 50x more memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 10 GB/s
• Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53724 vs 52523
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3595.432 vs 2036.763
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 132.701 vs 27.417

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	52523 53724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.103 140.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2036.763 3595.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.035 13.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.417 132.701
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	819.934 789.536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20151 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4646 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4195 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20151 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4646 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4195 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	7216 4739

Compare specifications (specs)