NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 283.4 GTexel / s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 9,068 gflops vs 7,168 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55504 vs 53223
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 vs 140.274
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 13.082
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 789.536
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 10116
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 3717
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 3356
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 10116
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 3717
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 3356
- Around 53% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7241 vs 4739
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 10 July 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s vs 224.0 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops vs 7,168 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55504 vs 53223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 vs 140.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 vs 13.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 vs 789.536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 vs 4739 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- 50x more memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3595.432 vs 2036.763
- 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 132.701 vs 27.417
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 vs 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 vs 27.417 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55504 | 53223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | 140.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | 3595.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | 13.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | 132.701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | 789.536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 | 4739 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9593 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Fiji |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 10 July 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | $549 |
Place in performance rating | 287 | 290 |
Price now | $439.99 | $399.99 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | 35.98 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | 7,168 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 56 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 10 GB/s | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |