NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) versus AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 Fury pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 77% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1771 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 27% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 283.4 GTexel / s versus 224.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 27% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 9,068 gflops versus 7,168 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 53% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55523 versus 53223
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 versus 140.274
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 13.082
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 789.536
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 versus 10116
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 versus 3717
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 versus 3356
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 versus 10116
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 versus 3717
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 versus 3356
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7241 versus 4739
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 versus 10 July 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s versus 224.0 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops versus 7,168 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 275 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55523 versus 53223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 versus 140.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 13.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 789.536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 versus 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 versus 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 versus 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 versus 4739 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2560
- 50x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 500 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3595.432 versus 2036.763
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 132.701 versus 27.417
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 2560 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 500 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 versus 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 versus 27.417 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55523 | 53223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | 140.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | 3595.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | 13.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | 132.701 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | 789.536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 | 4739 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9593 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | GP104 | Fiji |
Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 | 10 July 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499.99 | $549 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 287 | 290 |
Prix maintenant | $439.99 | $399.99 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.70 | 35.98 |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops | 7,168 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 8,900 million |
Unités de Compute | 56 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 4096 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10 GB/s | 500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |