NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 335.4x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 180 Watt
• 150x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 10 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 vs 150.103
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 vs 27.417
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 4646
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 4195
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 4646
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 4195

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1350 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55525 vs 42255
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 vs 1843.045
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 10.681
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 644.098
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 12180
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 12180
• Around 98% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7241 vs 3658

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	42255 55525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	152.235 150.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1843.045 2036.763
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.681 14.035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.607 27.417
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	644.098 819.934
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 20151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 4646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 4195
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12180 20151
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8926 4646
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8062 4195
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3658 7241

Compare specifications (specs)