NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 800M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce 800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 48x more texture fill rate: 283.4 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 53.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 48
- 64x better floating-point performance: 9,068 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 42.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 vs 1303
- 30.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 vs 4.91
- 18.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 vs 109.13
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.417 vs 7.249
- 53.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 15.218
- 28.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 703
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 1123
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 1601
- 28.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 703
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 1123
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 1601
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 17 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops vs 141.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 vs 1303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 vs 4.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 vs 109.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 vs 7.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 vs 15.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 vs 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 vs 1601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 vs 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 vs 1601 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- 12x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 180x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 10 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 800M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 | 1303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | 4.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | 109.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | 7.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | 15.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | 1601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 | 1601 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GF117 |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 17 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 254 | 1511 |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 738 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | 141.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 283.4 GTexel / s | 5.904 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready | ||
GameWorks | ||
Optimus |