NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA GeForce 800M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce 800M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 738 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 283.4 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s
- 53.3x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 48
- 64x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 9,068 gflops versus 141.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 1 GB
- 42.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 versus 1303
- 30.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 versus 4.91
- 18.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 109.13
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.417 versus 7.249
- 53.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 15.218
- 28.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 versus 703
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 versus 1123
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 versus 1601
- 28.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 versus 703
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 versus 1123
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 versus 1601
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 versus 17 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 738 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s versus 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops versus 141.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 versus 1303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 versus 4.91 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 109.13 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 versus 7.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 15.218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 versus 703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 versus 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 versus 1601 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 versus 703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 versus 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 versus 1601 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- 12x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 180x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 10 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 800M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 | 1303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | 4.91 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | 109.13 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | 7.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | 15.218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | 703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | 1601 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | 703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 | 1601 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP104 | GF117 |
| Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 | 17 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 254 | 1511 |
| Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops | 141.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s | 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIATesla P100 SXM2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
IntelArc Pro A50
