NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 290X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 2x 5,632 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 580 Watt
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 2x 4 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 19.441
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 March 2017 vs 24 June 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops vs 2x 5,632 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 580 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 2x 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 5400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 vs 19.441 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X2
- 6.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- Around 57% higher pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 3584
| Texture fill rate | 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 3584 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 290X2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18557 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62406 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | 19.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9870 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 290X2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GP102 | Hawaii |
| Launch date | 10 March 2017 | 24 June 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $1,399 |
| Place in performance rating | 201 | 282 |
| Price now | $826.98 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | 2x 5,632 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 2x 2816 |
| Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s | 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 580 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11,800 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 4x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 2x 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB / s | 2x 345.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 352 Bit | 2x 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
AppleA14 Bionic
