NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 1714.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6514 vs 6332
  • Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39228 vs 20732
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 8496
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 8496
  • 10.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 305
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 vs 25 October 2016
Pipelines 1024 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6514 vs 6332
Geekbench - OpenCL 39228 vs 20732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780 vs 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780 vs 8496
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3172 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

  • Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1035 MHz
  • Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 336
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2168
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1982
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2168
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1982
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1392 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Boost clock speed 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 650 vs 336
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3687 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3336 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3687 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3336 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6514
6332
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
336
650
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39228
20732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3172
305
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark 6514 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark 336 650
Geekbench - OpenCL 39228 20732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2168 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1982 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2168 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1982 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3172 305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name N18P-G62 GP107
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 25 October 2016
Place in performance rating 425 487
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $139
Price now $159.99
Value for money (0-100) 46.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1392 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 1392 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 1024 768
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 2,138 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C
Texture fill rate 66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 7 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 112 GB / s
Shared memory 0

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready