NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 1714.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6514 vs 6332
- Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39228 vs 20732
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 8496
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 8496
- 10.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 305
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 25 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6514 vs 6332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39228 vs 20732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 vs 8496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 vs 305 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 336
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2168
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1982
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2168
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1982
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 1982 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 2168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 1982 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6514 | 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39228 | 20732 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9780 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2168 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1982 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9780 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2168 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1982 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 | 305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | N18P-G62 | GP107 |
Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 425 | 487 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |