NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 510x more texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36290 vs 35369
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.465 vs 119.148
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.563 vs 21.766
• 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2954 vs 907

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

• Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1020 MHz
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1245 MHz
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 896
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 vs 6222
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 326
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 vs 1047.553
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 vs 7.88
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 vs 346.529
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 8824
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 8824

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6222 10079
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	326 747
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	36290 35369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	129.465 119.148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1047.553 1373.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.88 8.694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	78.563 21.766
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	346.529 454.799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8824 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8824 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3707 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2954 907

Compare specifications (specs)