NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 580

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1257 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1340 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 185 Watt
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10180 vs 8827
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55838 vs 39028
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 vs 116.142
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1961.932 vs 1022.932
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.169 vs 9.235
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 vs 84.034
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 vs 607.721
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 11281
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3695
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 11281
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3695

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580

• Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
• Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 751
• 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 vs 352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10180 8827
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	751 767
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55838 39028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.014 116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961.932 1022.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.169 9.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.29 84.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	787.025 607.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	352 1005

Compare specifications (specs)