NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55744 versus 55425
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 versus 150.103
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 109.29 versus 27.417
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 11173
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3690
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 11173
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3690
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 versus 27 May 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55744 versus 55425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 versus 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 versus 27.417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 versus 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 versus 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 1280
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15560 versus 10165
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 versus 750
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 1961.932
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 11.169
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 787.025
- 4.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1557 versus 357
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1280 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15560 versus 10165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 versus 750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 1961.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 787.025 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1557 versus 357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10165 | 15560 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 886 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55744 | 55425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 357 | 1557 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 | 27 May 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 287 | 286 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 500 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | 2-slot |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10 GB/s | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |