NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 95.04 GTexel/s versus 283.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 150x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.235 versus 150.103
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 115.607 versus 27.417
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 4646
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 4195
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 4646
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 4195
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 15 August 2016 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s versus 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 10 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 versus 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 versus 27.417 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 4195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 4195 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1771 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 1024
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55525 versus 42255
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 1843.045
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 10.681
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 644.098
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 versus 12180
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 versus 12180
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7241 versus 3658
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 1024 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55525 versus 42255 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 1843.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 10.681 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 644.098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 versus 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 versus 12180 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 versus 3658 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42255 | 55525 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 4195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 4195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3658 | 7241 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 15 August 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 290 | 288 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1485 MHz | 1771 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.04 GTexel/s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 7,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 10 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
