NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon 520
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- 9.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 865
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 203
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 26304
- 9.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 1182
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1242
- 9.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 1182
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 vs 865 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 203 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 26304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 1182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 1182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 520
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon 520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 865 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 203 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 26304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 1182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 1182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon 520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | TU107 | Oland |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Place in performance rating | 376 | 1109 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 1st Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 320 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 4.10 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 4 | |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 20 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla K80
