NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon 530
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 1030
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 174
- 7.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 5014
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 2021
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2246
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 2021
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2246
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 vs 1030 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 174 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 5014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530
- Around 66% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 vs 305
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 vs 305 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 530
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 1030 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 174 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 5014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon 530 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN |
| Code name | TU107 | Meso |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Place in performance rating | 376 | 1099 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 20/24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory type | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
