NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 975 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 4470
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 65.399
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 1230.47
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 6.371
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 78.519
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 345.793
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 2810
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3264
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 2810
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3264

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT

• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 vs 564
• 5.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1745 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 4470
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 65.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 1230.47
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 6.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 78.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 345.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 2810
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 2810
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3264
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 1745

Compare specifications (specs)