NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 926 MHz
• Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1206 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6600 MHz
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 33787
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 111.543
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 511.362
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 9983
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2443
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1674
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 9983
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2443
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1674

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)

• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7965 vs 7881
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 vs 564
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 1316.075
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 8.799
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 94.915
• 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 842 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 7965
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 723
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 33787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 111.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 1817.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 9.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 99.875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 511.362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 9983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 2443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1674
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 9983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 2443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1674
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 842

Compare specifications (specs)