NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 60% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 926 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1206 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 21% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6600 MHz
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 33787
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 111.543
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 511.362
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 9983
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1674
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 9983
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 1674
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 4 August 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 926 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1206 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6600 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 1674 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7965 versus 7881
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 versus 564
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 versus 1316.075
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 versus 8.799
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 versus 94.915
- 2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 842 versus 305
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7965 versus 7881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 versus 564 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 versus 1316.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 versus 8.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 versus 94.915 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 versus 305 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 7965 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 723 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 842 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU107 | Ellesmere |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 4 August 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $179 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 389 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 926 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 154.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |