NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 116.142
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 1022.932
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 84.034
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3695
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3695
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 39028 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 vs 116.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 vs 1022.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 vs 84.034 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 vs 7881
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 564
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 vs 8.799
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 573.418
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 10959
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 10959
- 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 vs 305
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 vs 7881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 vs 564 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 vs 8.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 vs 573.418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 vs 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 vs 10959 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 vs 305 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 8827 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 767 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 39028 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 116.142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 1022.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 9.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 84.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 607.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 1005 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU107 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $229 |
| Place in performance rating | 376 | 341 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1257 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla K80
