NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 4803
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 532
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 14261
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 37.505
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 864.402
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 3.09
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 40.457
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 84.186
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 6927
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 6927
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 vs 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 vs 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 vs 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 vs 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 vs 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 vs 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 5.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 vs 305
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 vs 305 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 1659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU107 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 | 25 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $249 |
| Place in performance rating | 376 | 576 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $249.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1152 | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla K80
