NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 52% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 61% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 4803
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 532
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 14261
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 37.505
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 versus 864.402
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 3.09
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 40.457
- 6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 84.186
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 6927
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 6927
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 25 June 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 versus 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- 5.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1659 versus 305
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3715 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 versus 305 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 1659 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | TU107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 25 June 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $249 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 576 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $249.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1152 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,378 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1152 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 94.1 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 500 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla K80
