NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7878 vs 2423
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 vs 242
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39420 vs 9088
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.955 vs 46.992
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1294.279 vs 535.24
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.756 vs 2.64
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.78 vs 44.7
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 569.916 vs 141.816
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 4027
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 4027
• 4.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3598 vs 888

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7878 2423
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	577 242
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39420 9088
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.955 46.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1294.279 535.24
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.756 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.78 44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	569.916 141.816
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3598 888

Compare specifications (specs)