NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 937 MHz
  • Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1038 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
  • 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 2392
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 240
  • 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 9329
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 46.992
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 535.24
  • 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 2.64
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 44.7
  • 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 141.816
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 4027
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 4027
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 April 2019 vs 21 February 2019
Core clock speed 1485 MHz vs 937 MHz
Boost clock speed 1665 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7881 vs 2392
PassMark - G2D Mark 564 vs 240
Geekbench - OpenCL 39165 vs 9329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 134.765 vs 46.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1316.075 vs 535.24
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.799 vs 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.915 vs 44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 573.418 vs 141.816
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10959 vs 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10959 vs 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

  • 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 888 vs 305
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 888 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7881
2392
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
564
240
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39165
9329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
134.765
46.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1316.075
535.24
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.799
2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
94.915
44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
573.418
141.816
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10959
4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10959
4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
305
888
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce MX250
PassMark - G3D Mark 7881 2392
PassMark - G2D Mark 564 240
Geekbench - OpenCL 39165 9329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 134.765 46.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1316.075 535.24
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.799 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.915 44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 573.418 141.816
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10959 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10959 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 305 888

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU107 GP108B
Launch date 30 April 2019 21 February 2019
Launch price (MSRP) $179
Place in performance rating 376 861
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1665 MHz 1038 MHz
Core clock speed 1485 MHz 937 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt
Transistor count 1,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
DisplayPort count 1
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory type GDDR5