NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA P106-100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA P106-100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 6724
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 251
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 36174
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 76.32
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 448.036
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1680
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1860
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1680

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1485 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 vs 134.765
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 vs 1316.075
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 vs 8.799
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 10959
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 10959
• 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 899 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA P106-100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 6724
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 251
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 36174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 163.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 1705.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 9.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 76.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 448.036
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1680
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 899

Compare specifications (specs)