NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 7766
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 7766
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 11029
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 11029
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 8 August 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 vs 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 vs 11029 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- 2.7x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1536
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 588 vs 487
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10972 vs 10202
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 1536 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6144 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 588 vs 487 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10972 vs 10202 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 588 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10202 | 10972 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5570 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | N18E-G0 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 117 | 158 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 4096 |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600S
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
