NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 723 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6144 MB vs 4 GB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 435
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10205 vs 3597
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 8593
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 8593
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 6508
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 6508
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 723 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6144 MB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 435 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10205 vs 3597 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 vs 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 vs 6508 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 8054
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 8054
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1536 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 8054 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 8054 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 435 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10205 | 3597 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5570 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 8593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 6508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 24690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 24690 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22044 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.199 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1284.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.881 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.169 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 312.822 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N18E-G0 | Amethyst |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 117 | 304 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 5,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
