NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1227 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3714
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3714
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 16345
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 16345
- 78.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 103
- 78.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 103
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1227 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 vs 16345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 vs 16345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 103 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1647 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1536
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 488
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10522 vs 10209
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 vs 488 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10522 vs 10209 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 516 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10209 | 10522 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5573 | 0 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 16345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 16345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 103 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34875 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | N18E-G0 | GP104 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 117 | 285 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1647 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1227 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 137.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s |