NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W9000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD FirePro W9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

AMD FirePro W9000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 975 MHz
1027.2x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
5.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 350 Watt
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8625 vs 6138
Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 31775
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 84.462
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 1734.394
Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 8.988
Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 vs 86.984
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 492.867 vs 460.234

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 April 2019 vs 14 June 2012
Core clock speed	1140 MHz vs 975 MHz
Texture fill rate	128.2 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 350 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8625 vs 6138
Geekbench - OpenCL	53834 vs 31775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	195.93 vs 84.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1919.95 vs 1734.394
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	14.6 vs 8.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	94.964 vs 86.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	492.867 vs 460.234

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000

Around 33% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1536
3.7x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 364

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2048 vs 1536
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	720 vs 364

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8625

6138

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

364

720

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

53834

31775

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

195.93

84.462

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1919.95

1734.394

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.6

8.988

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

94.964

86.984

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

492.867

460.234

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	AMD FirePro W9000
PassMark - G3D Mark	8625	6138
PassMark - G2D Mark	364	720
Geekbench - OpenCL	53834	31775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	195.93	84.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1919.95	1734.394
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	14.6	8.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	94.964	86.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	492.867	460.234
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4912

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	AMD FirePro W9000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	TU116	Tahiti
Launch date	23 April 2019	14 June 2012
Place in performance rating	333	336
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$3,999
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz
Core clock speed	1140 MHz	975 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	128.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.202 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.101 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1536	2048
Pixel fill rate	64.08 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	128.2 GTexel/s	124.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	350 Watt
Transistor count	6600 million	4,313 million
Floating-point performance		3,994 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
Dual-link DVI support
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		279 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	264 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	5500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5