NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 6.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12909 vs 12361
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 808 vs 724
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 174.714
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3336
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 13848
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65451 vs 60695
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 2573.643
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.305 vs 16.447
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 145.886
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 926.614

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12909 12361
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	808 724
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	60695 65451
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	208.608 174.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2573.643 3924.968
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.447 17.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.886 175.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	926.614 1226.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 3336

Compare specifications (specs)