NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12907 vs 11355
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 540
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6273 vs 5906
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12907 vs 11355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 540 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6273 vs 5906 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 16952
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 16952
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 vs 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 vs 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12907 | 11355 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 540 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6273 | 5906 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU116 | TU106B |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Place in performance rating | 214 | 215 |
| Price now | $279.99 | $349.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | 62.74 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 10,800 million |
| Pipelines | 1920 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon 740M
