NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1620 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 7008 MHz
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11659 vs 5918
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 323
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 vs 20732
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 vs 75.758
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1902.867 vs 843.503
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 vs 5.071
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.183 vs 24.676
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 vs 301.168
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 8496
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 8496
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 1065

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11659 5918
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	776 323
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	58014 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.842 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1902.867 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.408 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	116.183 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	875.838 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14998 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1065 2340

Compare specifications (specs)