NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 38.9x more texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 130 nm
- 7x more maximum memory size: 896 MB vs 128 MB
- Around 62% higher memory clock speed: 1134 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 42x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1385 vs 33
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 January 2009 vs 12 May 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 896 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1134 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1385 vs 33 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 129 vs 67
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 vs 67 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1385 | 33 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 67 | 129 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Rankine |
Code name | GT200B | NV35 |
Launch date | 15 January 2009 | 12 May 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Place in performance rating | 1232 | 1220 |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz | 325 MHz |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Floating-point performance | 673.9 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 240 | |
Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 3.0 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 127.0 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 448 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1134 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |