ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 720 vs 240
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 673.9 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 14% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 896 MB
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1134 MHz
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 vs 67
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3195
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3195
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 vs 15 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 896 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1134 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 vs 67 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3195 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- 2x more core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1385 vs 1165
- 23.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23256 vs 980
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1385 vs 1165 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 vs 980 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 | 1385 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 | 67 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 980 | 23256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.679 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Juniper | GT200B |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 | 15 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1232 | 1233 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $119.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 720 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 50.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 896 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 127.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1134 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5750 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 5600
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 275
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830M
