NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 71% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 896 MB
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1134 MHz
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 67
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3195
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3195
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 15 January 2009 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 896 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1134 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 vs 67 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3195 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 50.6 billion / sec vs 16.1 billion / sec
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 240 vs 192
- Around 30% better floating-point performance: 673.9 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1385 vs 1213
- 5.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23256 vs 4119
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec vs 16.1 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 240 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 673.9 gflops vs 518.4 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1385 vs 1213 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 vs 4119 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1213 | 1385 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 67 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4119 | 23256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.121 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 391.548 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.548 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.965 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2837 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1699 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2837 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF106 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 15 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1231 | 1233 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $119.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion / sec | 50.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | 2-way3-way |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 896 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB / s | 127.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1134 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 5600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 275
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
