NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM and ATI FirePro V4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 873.6 gflops vs 620.0 gflops
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.202 vs 5.886
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 661.765 vs 321.782
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 0.529
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.112 vs 14.184
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.736 vs 56.777
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 2211
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 2211
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3326
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 October 2010 vs 26 April 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops vs 620.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 vs 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 vs 321.782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 vs 0.529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 vs 14.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 vs 56.777 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3326 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 19% higher pipelines: 400 vs 336
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3400 MHz
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 vs 336 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 3400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | ATI FirePro V4800 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 | 321.782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 0.529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 | 14.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 | 56.777 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3326 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1672 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1512 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1512 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | ATI FirePro V4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF104 | Redwood |
Launch date | 11 October 2010 | 26 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1098 | 1099 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 627 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |