NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM versus ATI FirePro V4800
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM and ATI FirePro V4800 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 36.4 GTexel / s versus 15.5 GTexel / s
- Environ 41% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 873.6 gflops versus 620.0 gflops
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.202 versus 5.886
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 661.765 versus 321.782
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 versus 0.529
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.112 versus 14.184
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.736 versus 56.777
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 versus 2211
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 versus 2211
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3326
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3326
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 October 2010 versus 26 April 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.4 GTexel / s versus 15.5 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 873.6 gflops versus 620.0 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 versus 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 versus 321.782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 versus 0.529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 versus 14.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 versus 56.777 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 versus 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 versus 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3326 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI FirePro V4800
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 19% de pipelines plus haut: 400 versus 336
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 69 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 6% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3600 MHz versus 3400 MHz
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 versus 336 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz versus 3400 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V4800
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | ATI FirePro V4800 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | 5.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 | 321.782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 0.529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 | 14.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 | 56.777 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 2211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3326 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 456 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1672 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1512 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1512 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | ATI FirePro V4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF104 | Redwood |
Date de sortie | 11 October 2010 | 26 April 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1098 | 1099 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | 775 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 873.6 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 400 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.4 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 69 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 627 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 210 mm | 168 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 108.8 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3400 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |