NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 42 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
- Around 40% better floating-point performance: 1,345.0 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4107 vs 910
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 114
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 March 2010 vs 28 April 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 42 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,345.0 gflops vs 960.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4107 vs 910 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 114 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 73% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1848 MHz (3696 data rate)
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 3320
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 3320
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 480 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 vs 3320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 vs 3320 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4107 | 910 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 | 114 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.483 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3658 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3320 | 8618 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3658 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3320 | 8618 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
| Code name | GF100 | RV740 |
| Launch date | 26 March 2010 | 28 April 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $109 |
| Place in performance rating | 752 | 754 |
| Price now | $71.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 750 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,345.0 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 480 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 42 billion / sec | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 203 mm |
| SLI options | 2-way, 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480 vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480 vs
AMDRadeon 630
