NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti versus AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 billion / sec versus 25.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1554 versus 1043
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 versus 273
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 versus 8.039
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 versus 0.867
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 versus 2100
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 versus 2100
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 March 2011 versus 21 January 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 billion / sec versus 25.2 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1554 versus 1043 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 versus 273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 versus 8.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 versus 0.867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 versus 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 versus 2100 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6750
- 3.8x plus de pipelines: 720 versus 192
- Environ 46% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,008.0 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- Environ 35% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 86 Watt versus 116 Watt
- Environ 2% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 1026 MHz
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 544.041 versus 354.392
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.664 versus 18.511
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.074 versus 41.941
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3378 versus 3351
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3322
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3378 versus 3351
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3322
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 720 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,008.0 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt versus 116 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 1026 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.041 versus 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.664 versus 18.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.074 versus 41.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3378 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3378 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3322 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1554 | 1043 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 377 | 273 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5772 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 | 8.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | 544.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 | 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | 20.664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 | 91.074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF116 | Juniper |
Date de sortie | 15 March 2011 | 21 January 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | $49.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1046 | 1047 |
Prix maintenant | $287.59 | $49.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.49 | 33.46 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 720 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 billion / sec | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 116 Watt | 86 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 1,040 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | 170 mm |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 98.4 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1026 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |