NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 2400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti and ATI Radeon HD 2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 398 MHz
- 18.1x more texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 1.592 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 192 vs 40
- 21.7x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 31.84 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 1026 MHz vs 990 MHz
- 12.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 121
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 298
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 635
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 635
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 March 2011 vs 19 February 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 398 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec vs 1.592 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 31.84 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz vs 990 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 vs 121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 vs 298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 vs 635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 vs 635 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400
- 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 116 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 116 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 | 121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 | 298 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 635 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 2400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GF116 | RV610 |
| Launch date | 15 March 2011 | 19 February 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1019 | 1064 |
| Price now | $287.59 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 398 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 31.84 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec | 1.592 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 116 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 98.4 GB / s | 7.92 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz | 990 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1900
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
AMDRadeon E8860
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
