NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 589 MHz
- 6.1x more texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 4.71 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- 15.4x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 44.86 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 13.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 118
- 6.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 55
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 vs 2795
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 1017
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 1017
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 March 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 589 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec vs 4.71 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 44.86 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 vs 118 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 vs 55 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 vs 2795 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 vs 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 vs 1017 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 116 Watt
- Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1026 MHz
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 116 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 1026 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 | 118 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 | 55 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 | 2795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 | 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 | 1017 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF116 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 15 March 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1019 | 1637 |
| Price now | $287.59 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 589 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 44.86 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec | 4.71 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 116 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | 168 mm |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 98.4 GB / s | 12.64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz | 1580 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1900
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
AMDRadeon E8860
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 550 Ti vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
