NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6850

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3038 vs 1972
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.935 vs 13.033
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.344 vs 1.333
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.841 vs 32.609
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 3489
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 3489

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850

• 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 1,488.0 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
• Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 127 Watt vs 170 Watt
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 vs 425
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 946.933 vs 539.966
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.45 vs 64.308
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3683

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3038 1972
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	425 434
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.935 13.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	539.966 946.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.344 1.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.841 32.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.308 139.45
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4184 3489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4184 3489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3683 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3348

Compare specifications (specs)