NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti versus AMD Radeon HD 6850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and AMD Radeon HD 6850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 52.7 GTexel / s versus 37.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3038 versus 1972
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.935 versus 13.033
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.344 versus 1.333
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.841 versus 32.609
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 versus 3489
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 versus 3489
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 25 January 2011 versus 21 October 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s versus 37.2 GTexel / s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3038 versus 1972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 versus 13.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 versus 1.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 versus 32.609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 versus 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 versus 3489 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6850
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 384
- Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,488.0 gflops versus 1,263.4 gflops
- Environ 34% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 127 Watt versus 170 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 versus 424
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 946.933 versus 539.966
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.45 versus 64.308
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3683
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,488.0 gflops versus 1,263.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 127 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 versus 424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 946.933 versus 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.45 versus 64.308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3038 | 1972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 | 434 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11009 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 | 13.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 539.966 | 946.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 | 1.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 | 32.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 | 139.45 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 | 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 | 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | AMD Radeon HD 6850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF114 | Barts |
| Date de sortie | 25 January 2011 | 21 October 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | $179 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 822 | 823 |
| Prix maintenant | $138 | $99.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.88 | 28.63 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,263.4 gflops | 1,488.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 127 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 198 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | AGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.3 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 465
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX
