NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 4.9x more core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 36.6x more texture fill rate: 43.9 billion / sec vs 1.2 GTexel / s
- 120x more pipelines: 480 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 512 MB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 600 MHz
- 81.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3924 vs 48
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 470 vs 236
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 December 2010 vs 1 June 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec vs 1.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3924 vs 48 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 470 vs 236 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
- 21.9x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 219 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3924 | 48 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 470 | 236 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | GF110 | G72 |
Launch date | 7 December 2010 | 1 June 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Place in performance rating | 734 | 736 |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz | 300 MHz |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 480 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec | 1.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 112 million |
Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | 4.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 600 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) | 600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 64 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |