NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M and ATI Radeon X1950 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 6.6x more texture fill rate: 39.7 billion / sec vs 6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 19.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2074 vs 106
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 279
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3318 vs 2517
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3318 vs 2517
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2011 vs 29 January 2007 |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion / sec vs 6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2074 vs 106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 vs 279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3318 vs 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3318 vs 2517 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1950 GT
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 57 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 57 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1950 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M | ATI Radeon X1950 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2074 | 106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 279 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6389 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.415 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 690.98 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.702 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.215 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3626 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3318 | 2517 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3626 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3318 | 2517 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M | ATI Radeon X1950 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | R500 |
Code name | GF114 | RV570 |
Launch date | 28 June 2011 | 29 January 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 929 | 932 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $140 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion / sec | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 57 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |