NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 601 MHz
• Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 48.08 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 960
• Around 77% better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
• 2x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 2800 MHz
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.718 vs 10.054
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 vs 544.601
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 vs 1.46
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 vs 22.103
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.697 vs 36.553
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 vs 3855
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 vs 3855

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 130 Watt
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 3665
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 3325
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 3665
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 3325

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.718 10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1021.371 544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.143 1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.509 22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.697 36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5983 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3665 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5983 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3665 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 4470

Compare specifications (specs)